• Do not register here on develop.twiki.org, login with your twiki.org account.
• Use View topic Item7848 for generic doc work for TWiki-6.1.1. Use View topic Item7851 for doc work on extensions that are not part of a release. More... Close
• Anything you create or change in standard webs (Main, TWiki, Sandbox etc) will be automatically reverted on every SVN update.
Does this site look broken?. Use the LitterTray web for test cases.

Item5247: parse and aggregate svn log files for release information.

Item Form Data

AppliesTo: Component: Priority: CurrentState: WaitingFor: TargetRelease ReleasedIn
NotTWiki   Normal Being Worked On SvenDowideit n/a  

Edit Form Data

Summary:
Reported By:
Codebase:
Applies To:
Component:
Priority:
Current State:
Waiting For:
Target Release:
Released In:
 

Detail

see TWiki420SvnLog

-- TWiki:Main/SvenDowideit - 14 Jan 2008

I am concerned here

I have spent 1000s of hours testing new features and old features and have opened quite many bug reports where I spent 8-20 hours analysing the problem. And still it seems I have a minor role in the development of the release.

We cannot base the credits on SVN checkins. One feature can be a well tested feature with one checkin. Or it can be done with 100s of small incremental checkins.

It is not a fair way to evaluate contributions. I should be on the top 5 getting credit for 4.2.0 code with all the time I have spent testing.

-- TWiki:Main.KennethLavrsen - 14 Jan 2008

When I wrote above I had seen an earlier version of TWikiHistory.

Looks better now.

Maybe we also need to count the bug reporters and list the top core/default plugin bug reporters. Testing is as important as coding. And there are a few important contributors that have reported quite many bugs and for sure have spent many hours.

Also make sure only to count since release 4.1.2. We should not credit accumulated because then new contributors drown.

-- TWiki:Main.KennethLavrsen - 14 Jan 2008

I agree that we can't just use svn commits, it is just one metric. but if we measure no metrics, we're just pissing in the wind. I'd like to get to a point where we have several automatic metrics, and can make a knwon algorythm to combine them.

I also think there is still something not right with the HallOfFame svn stats - so I thought I'd play with making a more detailed alternative.

-- TWiki:Main.SvenDowideit - 14 Jan 2008

ItemTemplate
Summary parse and aggregate svn log files for release information.
ReportedBy TWiki:Main.SvenDowideit
Codebase

SVN Range TWiki-4.3.0, Sun, 30 Dec 2007, build 16120
AppliesTo NotTWiki
Component

Priority Normal
CurrentState Being Worked On
WaitingFor SvenDowideit
Checkins TWikirev:16223
TargetRelease n/a
ReleasedIn

Edit | Attach | Watch | Print version | History: r5 < r4 < r3 < r2 < r1 | Backlinks | Raw View | Raw edit | More topic actions
Topic revision: r5 - 2008-01-14 - SvenDowideit
 
This site is powered by the TWiki collaboration platform Powered by PerlCopyright © 2008-2019 by the contributing authors. All material on this collaboration platform is the property of the contributing authors.
Ideas, requests, problems regarding TWiki? Send feedback